Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 9 Aug 2014 23:49:37 +0100 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> napísal: > On Sat 09 Aug 2014 at 16:47:54 -0400, AW wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:26:40 -0400 > > Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Some of the reasons I switched my desktop from Ubuntu to Debian > > > were: > > > > > > 1) To do more config by editor and less by magical binary > > > program. > > > > > > 2) To get rid of gratuitous boot gunge (in this case Plymouth) > > > > > > 3) To get closer to the Unix Philosophy > > > > > > > A new thread... I chase this one, knowing full well that convincing > > anyone of anything is nearly impossible. > > This is the second thread on the same topic started by the OP in a > month. > I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract: Our priorities are our users and free software We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. We will support the needs of our users for operation in many different kinds of computing environments. Where is better place to tell, what are the Debian user's needs, as the Debian users ML? The Debian take care about not discriminating the women, gays and lesbians, etc. Then, please, do not discriminate the non systemd fans. Is here a group of users, which can appreciate the systemd? OK, they will be supported. Is here group of users, which don't need/want the systemd? OK too, but they need to be supported too, especially in switching time. But now it seems, that there is support (not only technical) for the first group only. Then it is needed to tell, what are user's interests... BTW: I am testing the systemd for some time. Despite some problems on my desktop machine, in my virtual environment all works without big problems. From these threads (which you are considering as OT) i learn and understand what are advantages of the systemd. But i can see more and more, that the systemd have no advantages for my small and simple environments and the SysV (with all it's problems) fulfills my needing. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature