Re: VLC error polluting terminal ( was: Re: testing-dedicated ML? ( was Re: End of hypocrisy ? ) )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 07/22/2014 12:16 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Concerning burying my request for help in an existing thread. I used
> Emacs to delete the reply-to header line and thought that would be
> enough. Obviously, not. I have learned yet another thing not to do. I
> apologize.
Deleting In-Reply-To does stop (good) mail clients from considering the
message part of the same thread, though in some cases also deleting (or
perhaps modifying?) the References header would be appropriate /
necessary to achieve that effect.
The trouble is that you didn't then change the Subject line, so
less-well-behaved mail clients will still sort it as part of the same
thread, and even for people who use better ones the message is still
being presented as being about the subject of the previous thread.
That said, it seems to me like it would be *more* trouble to manually
alter message headers before sending that way than it would be to
manually enter the To address... so I don't entirely understand why
you'd want to do it that way to begin with, except perhaps just "to see
if you can".
- --
The Wanderer
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=CQWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: