Re: is this sensible?

[berenger.morel@neutralite.org]

Le 27.06.2014 03:06, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:17:47PM +0200,
> berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
> > Le 26.06.2014 12:26, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> > >On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:26:03PM +0200,
> > >berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
> > >>
> > >>This is the problem with non interactive tools: if you do not 
> > master the
> > >>non
> > >>interactive tool, you do not have real control on it.
> > >
> > >If it is non interactive, then how do you master it?
> >
> > Knowing exactly what it does, depending on the parameters you gave 
> > it at
> > it's startup?
>
> Wouldn't they normally be quantitative parameters? I just thought, 
> this
> minute, that the *true master* would know what to do if it broke 
> down.

Well, the true master just send a butterfly to the right place, and the 
air movements it made plus their consequences allow to position the 
correct values on the targeted system.

http://xkcd.com/378/