Re: is this sensible?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:17:47PM +0200, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 26.06.2014 12:26, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> >On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:26:03PM +0200,
> >berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
> >>
> >>This is the problem with non interactive tools: if you do not master the
> >>non
> >>interactive tool, you do not have real control on it.
> >
> >If it is non interactive, then how do you master it?
>
> Knowing exactly what it does, depending on the parameters you gave it at
> it's startup?
Wouldn't they normally be quantitative parameters? I just thought, this
minute, that the *true master* would know what to do if it broke down.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: