[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems with ntp syncronization in wheezy



I don't use ntp.conf, I set the ntp servers addresses in "NTPSERVERS" option in /etc/default/ntpdate. I saw today that after a whole day my host got synchronized, that's the reason I still like my old ntpdate/cron scheme. Once I set it, I get synchronization right away. I could do this by stopping ntpd or I could use ntpd and before starting it do an old fashion "ntpdate $local_net_ntpserver" in command line.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Davies" <chris@roaima.co.uk>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 5:21:59 AM
Subject: problems with ntp syncronization in wheezy

Leonardo Cuyar Morales <leonardo@softel.cu> wrote:
> I just installed debian wheezy amd64. After having set ntp
> configurations in /etc/default/ntpdate file, like:
> - set the ntp server
> - do not read /etc/ntp.conf file

> the same configuration I did in squeeze, my result was wheezy does
> not get sincronized either.

> Have you had any experience with ntp in wheezy?

I've been using ntp since the '90s, and on Debian since sarge. FWIW I
also run an ntp pool server. I rarely use ntpdate other than as a very
quick comparison of clocks ("ntpdate -qu remote.ntp.server"), but usually
use ntpd. I prefer to tweak ntp.conf so that I have my own sources listed
either as servers or peers (depending on the situation, obviously).

Taking a quick look at ntpdate-debian it looks like it's one-off
synchronisation subject to all the failure modes of ntpdate itself. Is
there any particular reason why you want to use ntpdate(-debian) instead
of ntpd?

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] n6s05bxgq1.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] n6s05bxgq1.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk


Reply to: