Re: Iceweasel and DRM
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:16:07PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I disagree again. The presence of DRM material is an affront to the
> open nature of the web. Mozilla's decision to cave in to the DRM
> crowd doesn't need to be echoed by Debian. DRM isn't a user's
> choice. It's the choice of the site owners. Groups like Debian
> should be backing the FSF on this by refusing to endorse web content
> restrictions.
>
I guess this is going to be a debated topic. Having seen this [1], I do not
think there is any way to implement meaningful (for the companies) CDMs without
having them in non-free.
[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#introduction
Reply to: