[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Iceweasel and DRM



On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not use
it?

Debian is based on freedom. Iceweasel exists because Firefox contained
proprietary parts.
Iceweasel exists because the trademark policy for Firefox requires all
changes to the browser to be approved my the Mozilla Corporation and
this conflicts with Debian's usual security support strategy for stable.

Lately Mozilla has been providing the ESR and Debian has been upgrading
iceweasel in wheezy via the security archive. I'd say there are chances
that Jessie releases with Firefox instead of Iceweasel.

To not remove digital restrictions support undermines a
major strength of Debian. If people want DRM, they can always download
Firefox but they should have a choice for freedom.
There is no need to remove *support* for DRM, as long as it is Free
Software (according to Debian's definition). Whether to use it (or not)
must be the choice of the user.

Kind regards,
Andrei
I disagree again. The presence of DRM material is an affront to the open nature of the web. Mozilla's decision to cave in to the DRM crowd doesn't need to be echoed by Debian. DRM isn't a user's choice. It's the choice of the site owners. Groups like Debian should be backing the FSF on this by refusing to endorse web content restrictions.


Reply to: