On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 23:35:26 -0600
Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
On 3/8/2014 10:02 PM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 09:51:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 3/8/2014 2:18 PM, Patrick Alouidor wrote:
Hello all. I'm not sure if it me but I have a fresh install of
Debian 7 on laptop Toshiba C-55A5310. and For some reason I
cannot enable my wifi switch. I have been pressing the F keys but
no luck. please This is my first Laptop ever and I wanted to put
something stable on it and now I cannot get my wifi to turn on.
My I please get some form of assistance on wifi.
You mention a "wifi switch". There is no such thing. The laptop
has a "wireless ethernet adapter" usually of the 802.11 a/b/g/n
standard. It will "connect" to a "wireless router" or "wireless
access point".
Given the context I would surmise that "wifi switch" means a switch
on the laptop to enable/disable the wireless adapter, whether that
be an actual switch, button, or key-combo.
I would surmise his "wifi switch" is his wifi enabled cable/DSL router
that also has an inbuilt 4 port fast Ethernet or GbE switch, stated in
big bold letters on the box, prompting him to call it a "wifi switch".
Is your guess right or mine?
He didn't mention WEP/WAP key setup or any other manual configuration
steps/issues, which leads me to, again, guess, that he's trying to do
WiFi Protected Setup (WPS) auto configuration. So maybe by "wifi
switch" he means the WPS button on the WiFi router. And maybe Network
Manager/WICD use the function keys to initiate WPS auto negotiation.
I never do "auto" anything so again this is a guess. And I'd guess
based on his post that WPS is exactly what he's attempting.
The whole point of my post was to eliminate the guessing and get right
to helping the guy at the technical level, or lack thereof, which he
requires. It's pretty clear from his lack of correct terminology and
technical details, no initial troubleshooting performed by him, that
he's a total nub. All of the replies to this point, but mine, assume
he knows how to get a bash shell to run commands and perform other
common tasks. He may not even know that much. In fact, given he
assumes everyone knows why he's punching the function keys, it's
pretty certain he's a nub. And that's fine. But we need to know his
knowledge level in order to best assist him.
Stan,
You mention the whole point of your post was to eliminate the guessing.
You then assume, based on the original poster's generic one paragraph
post, that he's a "total nub". Personally, I call that guessing. On
your part.
In an earlier post, you state that there is no such thing as
a "wifi switch". I'd call that a guess, and a wrong one, because one of
my old laptops, I think my 2006 Acer, has a physical switch with which I
can enable or disable Wifi. Perhaps I'll post a photo of the switch.
You state "All of the replies to this point, but mine, assume he knows
how to get a bash shell to run commands and perform other common
tasks. He may not even know that much. In fact, given he
assumes everyone knows why he's punching the function keys, it's
pretty certain he's a nub." Another wrong guess Stan: See this:
http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread.php?214308-How-to-turn-on-off-Wireless-in-various-Laptop-Models
I could go on and on, but my saying you're a nub, and a mean one at
that, is no better for this list than your treatment of the original
poster.
Everyone,
Doesn't it seem that, on every list and IRC channel, there's always that
guy? The defender of the perfect symptom description, who has completely
memorized every portion of "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
except for the portion on how to answer questions in a helpful way.
The vigilante who just has to jump on every less than perfectly clued-in
post and insult the guy. I'm not talking about insulting the dweeb who
asks, then doesn't even read the answers, and asks again. I'm not
talking about insulting the guy asking the question that a two minute
web search can find the answer to. I'm talking about the guy who insults
people like the original poster, whose symptom description wasn't all
that bad, at least for a first stab at it. A symptom description that
others felt was good enough to suggest diagnostic processes.
The angry and insulting behavior of the defenders of the perfect
symptom description does nothing but cut down on technical
communication, raise the noise level, and often raise the heat level.
Why do that? I mean really, is it too much to ask that these guys simply
ignore posts they think are bogus? Or if the thread bothers them,
filter the thread? The list will be better for it.
To the original poster:
In the words of Jonathan Dowland, who posted this on debian-users
yesterday:
"Don't be afraid to ask any questions. Ignore any useless answers."
SteveT
Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance