[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt-get vs. aptitude





Le 13.10.2013 19:44, Frank McCormick a écrit :
On 13/10/13 01:02 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:10:14PM -0300, msl09 wrote:
Oh I have fond memories of aptitude breaking my system. Once it
suggested me to remove most of my system, including apt, I thought it was going to upgrade it so I confirmed it. I had to reinstall apt from
the debian packages website.

In this new installation I gave it another try but when it started
suggesting very weird plans(like remove all gnome packages) ...

It seems like aptitude has gotten a lot smarter lately. :)



  Not this morning it wasn't.

  Aptitude has been refusing to do a full upgrade on my Jessie system
for the past two weeks because it said it needed xorg-video-abi-12 but
it said it is not installable. Well, not so. I tried running Synaptic
this morning and it had no problem finding what it needed and
installing it. I still don't understand what the difference was but
Synaptic did what aptitude said it couldn't do. What could be the
difference ? Does Synaptic not use the same repo source files aptitude
uses?

Cheers

Did you tried synaptic just after aptitude, without updating the package list? If not, then maybe the package which gave you problems with aptitude was added by that update.


Reply to: