Re: terminal emulator compatible with Ecma-48
On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:30:03 PM UTC-4, Chris Davies wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > What I recall of the PuTTY FAQ (a specific pointer would help) is that
> > it's roughly comparable to rxvt
that's not what I meant by "specific". You stated that
> I'd extend that to suggest that most terminal emulators support the
> majority of VT220 sequences, not just the VT100 subset.
> The PuTTY FAQ seems to claim that it's either implemented everything
> or else documented what it hasn't implemented. This might be a good
> starting point.
Noting where PuTTY claims/documents the "everything" would be helpful.
As I noted, PuTTY's coverage of the escape sequences makes it
roughly comparable to rxvt.