Re: rootfs
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:09:24PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > /dev/mapper/debian-usr 4,6G 1,2G 3,2G 28% /usr
> >
> > There's no real need to have /usr separate from /
> > You could potentially merge the two.
>
> Unless you follow the installer, best practice and the Filesystem
> Hiearchical Standard then no not at all.
>
> Don't believe opinion as fact just because it's on a server hosted by
> freedesktop.org. Rusty Russel and the FHS is a more authoritative (and
> correct) source, I suggest you read it.
I am, as a matter of fact, subscribed to the FHS list. If you read
the specification, you'll see that it does not in any way require
/usr to be a *mountpoint*; it can be located on the root filesystem
without any problems. It's actually the default partitioning method.
Do you have any concrete reasons to have /usr separate from / ?
It may be instructive to read
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00152.html
and the rest of the thread it is in.
Also note that in jessie, I plan to mount /usr in the initramfs
(the patches are already written) and to deprecate a separate
/usr. This will make /usr available from before init starts
(the immediate goal), and potential unification of / and /usr
further down the line (jessie+1 or later).
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rootfs
- From: Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk>
- References:
- rootfs
- From: Raffaele Morelli <raffaele.morelli@gmail.com>
- Re: rootfs
- From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>
- Re: rootfs
- From: Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk>