[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sources.list Question



Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Ralf Mardorf écrivait:

> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:27 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
>> > > > > Hello List,
>> > > >
>> > > > It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
>> > > > mailing lists.
>> > >
>> > > According to my email client (KMail 1.9.10) he didn't.  What thread did
>> > > you think that he had hijacked?
>> > >
>> > > Gmail also thinks that he started a new "conversation", but Gmail often
>> > > breaks threads.
>> >
>> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/11/msg00909.html
>> >
>> > so Fred is the OP.
>> 
>> Quite.  Exactly.  And Chris said that he hijacked the thread.
>
> errare humanum est

No error in this case. He hijacked Crypticmofo's message id
50AC43A5.3010001@gmail.com as marked on my client (Gnus), and marked on
lists.debian.org:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/11/thrd2.html#00909

Maybe gmail uses refs + subject to mark threads.

The real problem hijacking threads is that fred question can be deleted
because of original thread removal.

Lisi, consider change or upgrade your client ;)


Reply to: