lee: > Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes: > >> Firstly, you could have specified that instead of broad statements like >> "32 bit support has been removed from Debian". Debian is much more than >> the amd64 architecture. > > That is what 32bit support is about. No. First and foremost, 32 Bit support is about supporting 32 Bit hardware. >> Secondly, so far you have not provided any evidence to this. > > Just try it and you'll see. Works for me. But then I don't use nVidia drivers. > nobody knows. I've sent a bug report and it has been ignored. People > suggested that we're now forced to switch to brokenarch and to use > packages from unstable, which I tried a couple times, and it made things > worse and didn't work and creates dependency problems. What do you expect when using testing/unstable? Their sole purpose is to find and fix bugs. If you use it, expect to find bugs. Really, I can understand if people are a little upset that the transition (in testing/unstable) to multiarch breaks a few things. And I am not happy myself that it looks like wheezy will not include a smooth transition. But that does not mean multiarch is generally broken and that Debian should keep distributing monstrosities like ia32-libs. > And it's certainly no fun that Debian becomes more and more like > windoze in being unreliable, in telling you what software and drivers > you can or should use and some other things. Debian as a whole never cared very much for non-free software. This should not surprise you. > Maybe I need to switch to windoze […] Sure, if that helps. J. -- When I get home from the supermarket I don't know what to do with all the plastic. [Agree] [Disagree] <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature