[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NetXtreme BCM5722 strangeness on Proliant ML115



On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:35:24 +0100, Berni Elbourn wrote:

> On 07/07/12 15:18, Camaleón wrote:

(...)

>> Have you noted an increment of packets being dropped when the system is
>> running a concrete task or process that can exhaust the available
>> memory? I ask this because Google suggest that dropped packates can be
>> related to low memory situations :-?
>>
>>> Anyone else seeing this? How to progress?  .. should I log a debian
>>> bug, or just go buy an Intel card? Or ? :-)
>>
>> In workstations and servers I always try to have at least a couple of
>> different NIC cards (from different manufacturers and models) just to
>> prevent these situations, because if you think about it, what's a
>> server with no network connection? Nowadays, close to nothing; a
>> toaster is even more useful :-)
>>
> Strangest thing. The dropped packets stopped at 3000 odd. After reboots
> (this machine is shutdown overnight) the number of dropped packets seems
> to stop incrementing at 20 or 30 or so even after several gigabytes of
> transfer.

You mean with Squeeze's stock kernel or the backported one? :-?

> Performance however is fine with the backports kernel:

If there's a noticeable difference between both kernels, I would report 
it just in the event the problem can be addressed and patched for the 
upcoming dot point releases.
 
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (Debian 3.2.20-1~bpo60+1)
> (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8) )
> #1 SMP Fri Jun 29 20:42:29 UTC 2012
> 
> $ sudo ethtool eth0

(...)

This output looks normal.

> $ sudo ethtool -k eth0

(...)

> $ sudo ethtool -i eth0
> driver: tg3
> version: 3.121
> firmware-version: 5722-v3.07, ASFIPMI v6.02 bus-info: 0000:11:00.0
                    ^^^^^^^^^^

And also these.

Well, you can check if there's the possibility fo getting an updated 
firmware but for NICs I never had to did an update before :-?


> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:21:5a:d3:d0:0c
>            inet addr:192.168.2.10  Bcast:192.168.2.255 
>            Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::221:5aff:fed3:d00c/64
>            Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>            RX packets:123154 errors:0 *dropped:26* overruns:0 frame:0 TX
>            packets:131936 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>            collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>            RX bytes:15913111 (15.1 MiB)  TX bytes:107913843 (102.9 MiB)
>            Interrupt:19

Despite the small number of dropped packages (26) the total ammount of 
received packages is also very low (15.1 MiB), there shouldn't be a 
single drop.

Is "dmesg | grep -i eth0" showing any anomaly?

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


Reply to: