[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NetXtreme BCM5722 strangeness on Proliant ML115



On 09/07/12 15:14, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:35:24 +0100, Berni Elbourn wrote:

On 07/07/12 15:18, Camaleón wrote:

(...)

Have you noted an increment of packets being dropped when the system is
running a concrete task or process that can exhaust the available
memory? I ask this because Google suggest that dropped packates can be
related to low memory situations :-?

Anyone else seeing this? How to progress?  .. should I log a debian
bug, or just go buy an Intel card? Or ? :-)

In workstations and servers I always try to have at least a couple of
different NIC cards (from different manufacturers and models) just to
prevent these situations, because if you think about it, what's a
server with no network connection? Nowadays, close to nothing; a
toaster is even more useful :-)

Strangest thing. The dropped packets stopped at 3000 odd. After reboots
(this machine is shutdown overnight) the number of dropped packets seems
to stop incrementing at 20 or 30 or so even after several gigabytes of
transfer.

You mean with Squeeze's stock kernel or the backported one? :-?

Performance however is fine with the backports kernel:

If there's a noticeable difference between both kernels, I would report
it just in the event the problem can be addressed and patched for the
upcoming dot point releases.

$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (Debian 3.2.20-1~bpo60+1)
(debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8) )
#1 SMP Fri Jun 29 20:42:29 UTC 2012

$ sudo ethtool eth0

(...)

This output looks normal.

$ sudo ethtool -k eth0

(...)

$ sudo ethtool -i eth0
driver: tg3
version: 3.121
firmware-version: 5722-v3.07, ASFIPMI v6.02 bus-info: 0000:11:00.0
                     ^^^^^^^^^^

And also these.

Well, you can check if there's the possibility fo getting an updated
firmware but for NICs I never had to did an update before :-?


eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:21:5a:d3:d0:0c
            inet addr:192.168.2.10  Bcast:192.168.2.255
            Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::221:5aff:fed3:d00c/64
            Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
            RX packets:123154 errors:0 *dropped:26* overruns:0 frame:0 TX
            packets:131936 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
            collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
            RX bytes:15913111 (15.1 MiB)  TX bytes:107913843 (102.9 MiB)
            Interrupt:19

Despite the small number of dropped packages (26) the total ammount of
received packages is also very low (15.1 MiB), there shouldn't be a
single drop.

Is "dmesg | grep -i eth0" showing any anomaly?

Greetings,


I'll give the code from the broadcom website a wiz...just for the record here is the status after a few hours of use:

# sudo ifconfig eth0
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:21:5a:d3:d0:0c
          inet addr:192.168.2.10  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::221:5aff:fed3:d00c/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:14050436 errors:0 dropped:26 overruns:0 frame:2
          TX packets:3730779 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:20348704555 (18.9 GiB)  TX bytes:614582976 (586.1 MiB)
          Interrupt:19

# dmesg | grep eth0
[    1.191804] e100 0000:02:04.0: eth0: addr 0xfafff000, irq 18, MAC addr 00:90:27:b0:0a:7d
[    6.508590] udev[474]: renamed network interface eth1 to eth1-eth0
[    6.532526] udev[470]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1
[    6.584538] udev[474]: renamed network interface eth1-eth0 to eth0
[   11.677058] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[   14.772314] tg3 0000:11:00.0: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex
[   14.772319] tg3 0000:11:00.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
[   14.772698] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
[   25.520006] eth0: no IPv6 routers present


--
"Confidence is what you have before you understand a problem" - Woody Allen


Reply to: