[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OT] Ayn Rand (was: Sugestions for New Releases of Debian)



On 06/09/2012 12:37 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
I'm too new to Debian to say how good or bad that history is, but it seems OK to me. I have long wished that someone with real Social Science creds would study us as a counter example to the maunderings of Ayn Rand.
OK, sorry, but I had to latch on to this. Being a former (reformed?) objectivist, I have to offer a bit of a defense for Rand. I have long been of the type that believes Rand (the writer, not the person) was misunderstood, i.e. she is not truly against selflessness, just parasitism.

Ayn Rand wrote:
Do you ask if it's ever proper to help another man? No - if he claims it as his right or as a moral duty that you owe him. Yes - if such is your own desire based on you own selfish pleasure in the value of his person and his struggle. Suffering as such is not a value; only man's fight against suffering, is. If you choose to help a man who suffers, do it only on the grounds of his virtue, of his fight to recover, of his rational record, or of the fact that he suffers unjustly; then your action is still a trade, and his virtue is the payment for your help.

I don't think her philosophy is necessarily against the altruism that Debian embodies, because I think she misunderstands the concept of altruism. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt as a non-native English speaker. As it applies to Debian, we all use and/or contribute. Why? Because we all receive a benefit. Only the RMS-s of the world are on some sort of ideological good/evil free software crusade. The rest of us think that free software helps all of us and has a practical benefit. We believe that free software is more secure (Linus' Law), and more useful (esp. in terms of customization) than closed-source software. We *want* this benefit o continue to exist, both for our own and others' benefit. We want others to be able to grow and learn, and Debian is a way of doing this. Contribution is not so much of a moral obligation as much as all of us doing something *we love to do* and contributing it back so that others can use and improve on it as well for its own sake - to our own pleasure.

OK, I've wasted enough of the list's bandwidth </rant> :-)

--
rbmj


Reply to: