[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...



Thanks!

Can you provide some specific model numbers? I'll need a box that can do IPv6 tunneling over IPv4, since none of the ISP's I have access to have native IPv6 or any plans for it in the foreseeable future. Of course, it will also need to be able to do basic stateful fire-wall stuff, and the IPv4 side will need to do NAT and port translation.

Thanks!

Rick


On Dec 27, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:

Most of the manufacturers already do (or don't you consider sub-$100AU
cheap?)
Apple, Allied Telesis, AVM, Buffalo Tech, Cisco, D-Link, Funkwerk E.C., *cough* Juniper Networks, Linksys, Sonicwall, Trendnet. All sell "cheap"
home/office routers. That's an incomplete list - and I've not covered
enterprise solutions.


Reply to: