Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
On 27/12/11 22:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma, 27 dec 11, 01:20:27, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> (Sigh!) ;-\ Now if somebody would just manufacture and sell an
>> inexpensive IPv6-capable SOHO router... /-; (sigh!)
Most of the manufacturers already do (or don't you consider sub-$100AU
Apple, Allied Telesis, AVM, Buffalo Tech, Cisco, D-Link, Funkwerk E.C.,
*cough* Juniper Networks, Linksys, Sonicwall, Trendnet. All sell "cheap"
home/office routers. That's an incomplete list - and I've not covered
> Get the cheapest router that supports alternate firmware. As far as I
> know most of the alternatives already support IPv6.
>  OS would be more accurate
Anything that'll run DD-WRT will run IPV6 - so chances are you already
have an IPV6 capable router.
Or put some NICs in a dedicated Debian box.
Iceweasel/Firefox extensions for finding answers to Debian questions:-