[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: which system is similar with debian



On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011 schrieb lina:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi!
>
>> I want to download a software, which only provided the below options
>> except Windows:
>>
>> 1] RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 (64 bit)
>> 2] RedHat Enterprise Linux 5 (64 bit)
>> 3] Suse Linux Enterprise 10/11 (64 bit).
>>
>> I am not sure which one will relatively better fit the x86_64
>> GNU/Linux wheezy one.
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions.
>
> I think SLES 11 has the newest kernel of these that should be nearer in
> version to the 2.6.32 in Squeeze. Apart from that one could try to compare
> libc6 versions, but anyway, if not sure I would download them all and try
> which one works best.
>
> Are these rpm packages?

I just downloaded the .tgz ball version.

http://download.accelrys.com/downloads/7227362e1f1039be115bcbe4081d9787/DS31Client.tgz


during the alien it showed me:
# alien -i DS31Client.tgz
	dpkg --no-force-overwrite -i ds31client_1-2_all.deb
Selecting previously unselected package ds31client.
(Reading database ... 252578 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ds31client (from ds31client_1-2_all.deb) ...
Setting up ds31client (1-2) ...

and nothing more,

later when I untar the .tgz ball, and $ ./DS31Client.bin


          Initializing InstallShield Wizard........
          Extracting Installation Archive.

it showed me this and nothing more.

I even didn't know how to check it works or not. or whether it's
installed or not.
>
> Ciao,
> --
> Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
> GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 201110191103.41872.Martin@lichtvoll.de">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 201110191103.41872.Martin@lichtvoll.de
>
>


Reply to: