Re: monitor detection maybe not working
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 16:06:24 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I don't think he did. :)
>> Paul Scott<waterhorse@ultrasw.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
>>>> On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>>>>> 1024x768 60.0*
>>>>> 800x600 60.3 56.2
>>>>> 848x480 60.0
>>>>> 640x480 59.9
>>>>> My LCD monitor's native resolution is 1280x1024
>>>> xrandr believes VGA-1 is only capable of 1024x768. Why do you believe
>>>> 1280x1024 is possible?
>
> I didn't show all of xrandr:
You've not shown it here, either. :)
> VGA-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
> 1024x768 60.0*
> 800x600 60.3 56.2
> 848x480 60.0
> 640x480 59.9
> VGA-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> TV-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
> 720x576 50.0 +
> 1024x768 50.0*
> 800x600 50.0
> 720x480 50.0
> 640x480 50.0
> 400x300 100.0
> 320x240 100.0
> 320x200 100.0
> DVI-D-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
>
> Does this not say that the card will support up to 4096x4096 ?
No. 4096x4096 is the maximum virtual screen size.
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.2
Reply to: