Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable
On Sun, 29 May 2011 10:26:25 -0400, Dan wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Camaleón <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:41:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote:
>>>> And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so.
>>> And why should we care (as long as we still get security support, even
>>> if it's only from Debian).
>> Anyone who estimates his/her security should care.
>> We all know (or should know) that any piece of software that is not
>> being actively developed (upstream) is a security risk. Yes, Debian
>> security team can catch and patch some flaws but not all. Heck, they're
>> good but not super-heroes with extra-powers... or are they? ;-)
> That is a good point. What do you think that it is more secure to use
> chromium from the stable repositories or chrome from google's
Well, the fact is that nowadays there must be more users running Chrome
(for whatever OS) than users running Debian's Chromium so it's my
understanding that more people using a program gives a higher chance for
more bugs to be catched.
> Do you think that the chromium version which is at the stable
> repositories is secure enough?
It should be. Look at the changelog, it's plenty of bug fixes:
So, while you don't get any additional feature/enhancement that could
have been added to the latest Chrome relase (11.x), you are still getting