[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

In <[🔎] pan.2011.>, Camaleón wrote:
>On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:21:24 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In <[🔎] pan.2011.>, Camaleón wrote:
>>>On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>>> "Obsolete" isn't the right term.
>>>How would you call the Firefox 3.0.x branch? Legacy?
>> I'd call 3.0.x deprecated but, I'd call 3.5.x stable. :P
>Grr!! :-)

Sorry, I am being a bit pedantic, but I don't consider much in Debian stable 
as "obsolete".  Check the popcon scores for real usage numbers.

I consider very little in Debian testing / Sid as "stable", and I think all 
good software deserves some time as stable-but-not-obsolete. :)

>But "deprecated" and "obsolete" are pretty the same. Should you have said

Deprecated comes before obsolete.  Ideally, obsolete comes before 
unmaintained, but sometimes that's not true.

1. Using the object is recommended against by the maintainer(s); at this point 
the object is deprecated.  Presumably, the maintainers should indicate an 
2. Use of the object ceases or is reduced enough to label the object as 
"disused"; at this point the object is obsolete.  This is a rather subjective 
3. Maintenance of the object ceases; at this point the object is unmaintained.

(I have a number of persons in my area that still want to use Linux on HPPA; I 
still consider it obsolete.)

In the land of free software, it is possible for anyone with the time and 
desire to become the maintainer of some piece of software, so deprecated and 
unmaintained depends on which maintainer you choose to believe.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: