[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What is the recommended way to handle squeeze-proposed-updates?

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 04:05:20PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <[🔎] 20110519195909.GA8991@Europa.office>, Freeman wrote:
> >Proposed-updates replaces the volatile archive.
> No, that's stable-updates, not stable-proposed-updates.

Ugh. True this is.

So stable-proposed-updates specifically regards the next point release.

While stable-updates regards situations like the classic ClamAV example.

And there is overlap from stable-updates packages also included in point



"Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the
answer." --Somebody

Reply to: