On 04/02/2011 12:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 15:40, Ron Johnson wrote:On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson[snip]Why not use the Debian standard?? day-of-week, dd month yyyy hh:mm:ss +zzzzToo verbose, not sortable Cheers, Kelly ClowersSo... the RFC standards for internet communication is not good enough? or the Debian Policy standard or the standard of *this* mailing list:- (eg. as used in http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/04/msg00141.html) And *you* can't sort the in-place standards? Let me guess - do you also use the imperial measurement system? Did someone mention Cultural Imperialism earlier? ;-pI've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the heck says "Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011"?) and *monumentally shortsighted* (did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).Um, apropos of what (Unix time)??
I don't understand your question.
OpenVMS does it one of the two Right WaysThere's two "right" ways?? :-)
I know you're trying to be funny, but sure: there's usually more than one way to skin a cat. In this case, the other Right Way (or should I say Ways) are ISO 8601.
of displaying time (01-Apr-2011 23:27:41)Which *is* RFC 2822....and has an epoch date of 17-NOV-1858 00:00:00.00 (modified Julian date adopted by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for satellite tracking) and keeps time in a signed 64 bit integer using 100ns resolution).Interesting... Cheers
-- "Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt." Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749