[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: can somebody list contents of linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686? [was: Re: trying to understand/purge linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686]



On 02/06/10 03:07 PM, H.S. wrote:
> On 02/06/10 03:02 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Mi, 02 iun 10, 13:46:47, H.S. wrote:
>>>
>>> If somebody has the package linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 on their system
>>> someplace (may be even in /var/cache/apt/archives/) or installed, I
>>> would like to know its contents. If the package is installed, the
>>> following output will be great:
>>> $> dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
>>
>> $ ls /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-*
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-1_amd64.deb
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-2_amd64.deb
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-3_amd64.deb
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-4_amd64.deb
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-5_amd64.deb
>>
>> I only have these, does it help?
> 
> A bit, yes. If you can give the output of the following command, it will
> be better (list contents of the specified package, you can use any from
> the list you gave above):
> $> dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64_2.6.32-1_amd64.deb

Sorry, my bad. The command should be:
$> dpkg -L <name of package installed> | grep -v 'lib.modules'

or, if you want to list the contents of a deb file (instead of an
installed package), the following will give the same info (might need to
be root or use sudo for apt's cache files):
#> sudo dpkg -c /path/to/foo.deb  | grep -v 'lib.modules'


The grep command effectively filters out all the lines with lib/modules
in them.

Thanks.


-- 

Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just
filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without
ever having been read.


Reply to: