[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian on EEE -- really nice, but how can I resize windows which already seem to be at their minimal size?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr> writes:

> Dne, 01. 02. 2010 15:38:26 je Merciadri Luca napisal(a):
>> Here is a new
>> screenshot of it:
>> http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/FPM2.png.
>
> Unfortunately, your link gives me a PAGE NOT FOUND error ...
Sorry, it was
http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/FMP2.png.
>
>> You may
>> notice that the button now appears correctly. However, I think that it
>> is not possible to configure devilpsie so that every window which has
>> an overall height bigger than a given threshold (i.e. height >
>> threshold) looses its decorations (i.e. (undecorate) is applied to
>> it).
>> Is it possible?
>
> I doubt it. In Devilspie, you may reference windows by their name,  
> program name, PID and so on, but I don't think you can reference them  
> by window size.
>
>> 
>> And if the window is too big, even devilspie's trick will not be
>> useful anymore. It is likely to be the case in some windows. In these
>> cases, what should I do?
>
> Perhaps the "wintype" argument might help you. The only way to know  
> that, however, would be by experimenting. Maybe there are some window  
> types that can override "fixed-size" windows?
>
>> Thanks.
>
> You're welcome. I wish I could be of more help, but I am just an  
> ordinary user of Devilspie (not even what you could call a "power" user  
> ;)
No problem. All the explanations were useful and precise. Thanks all.

- -- 
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- -- 

Fine feathers make fine birds.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAktnA5oACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhwu7wCeIuttCJ0RLyKr4gy5E70YIAxg
OxMAnR4ZeG0JktbxizpIOAS2td50fjAB
=1U1S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: