Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
From: Allan Wind <allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:07:02 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100927140702.GF9344@lifeintegrity.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTim0Jf=euJCqdJgSrJ0UwpQvaSeuSBh9V3K3t=ih@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] AANLkTim0Jf=euJCqdJgSrJ0UwpQvaSeuSBh9V3K3t=ih@mail.gmail.com>

On 2010-09-27T16:14:04, Siju George wrote:
> Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations  for high
> volume websites?  Varnish or Squid ?

We are planning on rolling out Varnish in production.  Squid is 
the grand-daddy.  Your favorite search engine should pull up some 
benchmarks if you cannot run any yourself.

<http://deserialized.com/reverse-proxy-performance-varnish-vs-squid-part-2/>
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/290079/tux-varnish-or-squid>
<http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2010/05/26/accelerating-the-internet-or-actually-squid-with-varnish/>
...

/Allan
-- 
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
<http://lifeintegrity.com>

Reply to:

References:
- Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
  - From: Siju George <sgeorge.ml@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Problem installing mount in Sid amd64!
Next by Date: RE: Squeeze. nVidia video. How to change brightness with functional (Fn) keys?
Previous by thread: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread