Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Sajith A <asajith@gmail.com>
Subject: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
From: Siju George <sgeorge.ml@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:14:04 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTim0Jf=euJCqdJgSrJ0UwpQvaSeuSBh9V3K3t=ih@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations  for high
volume websites?
 Varnish or Squid ?

any body using Varnish in production Environments?

thanks :-)

--Siju

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
  - From: Allan Wind <allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com>
- Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
  - From: Gilles Mocellin <gilles.mocellin@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: loose access control that works for dynamic IP address
Next by Date: Re: loose access control that works for dynamic IP address
Previous by thread: Re: Problem installing mount in Sid amd64!
Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread