[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unicode Character key-in problem



Phil Requirements wrote:
On 2010-09-10 18:56:03 -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
Phil Requirements wrote:
...
GNU/Linux has an *improved* method of inputting these special
characters.  In Windows, you have to memorize these four digit codes
that don't mean anything. In GNU/Linux, I memorize two-letter codes
that actually hint at the meaning.

On the other hand, a method based on hexadecimal character codes can
handle a lot more characters than you can memorize two-key combinations
for, and ... [you] can use
standard Unicode code point numbers for characters (which are also used
in HTML, [etc.]).
the character in those other places; learning a hex code would.)


I agree with your point that the ability to enter hex codes would be
portable in a certain way. However, they are not mnemonic at all, and
are difficult to memorize.

I was trying to address the very specific problem the original poster
had laid out. He had certain characters that he needed frequently,
which he had memorized the decimal ASCII code for. In that situation
(an average user who needs to enter some special characters now and
then) I still think that the two-letter mnemonic codes are an
improvement over memorizing decimal ASCII codes.

It's a good and valid point about working with Unicode codes. But my
email that you are quoting was written on a simpler level than that.

I didn't mean that GNU/Linux isn't improved because it adds the
composition method (or that the composition is an improvement in many
cases).  I just meant to point out that it wouldn't clearly be an
improvement if Linux(/GTK/X11/etc.) had also dropped the numeric entry
method.

(I'm thinking of when Macintoshes first came out--they added (relative
to typical computers of the day) the mouse, which was a big improvement
in most cases, but they dumbly dropped the left and right arrow keys.
That combination definitely was _not_ an improvement in cases such as
correcting a typo a couple of characters back from the text cursor.)

Daniel



Reply to: