Conclusion: FAT mount, UTC and localtime

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Conclusion: FAT mount, UTC and localtime
From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] i1lmkl$ep6$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] i1i3v9$n1n$2@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20100714043209.GA2208@thayer-boyle.com> <[🔎] i1kmu2$o0s$5@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] i1kphf$hm0$1@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] i1llm1$o0s$6@dough.gmane.org>

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:44:49 +0000, T o n g wrote:

> $ date; hwclock --show
> Wed Jul 14 20:33:58 EDT 2010
> Wed 14 Jul 2010 08:33:58 PM EDT  -0.953730 seconds
> 
> Seems to me my hardware clock is set to local time here instead.

Nope, it get correctly interpreted by the system. 

Thanks to Dave's solution, problem solved now. Reposting below:

The bug report contains the following work-around, as root run these 
commands:

hwclock --systohc --utc
hwclock --hctosys --utc

Thanks everyone who replied.

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conclusion: FAT mount, UTC and localtime
  - From: "H.S." <hs.samix@gmail.com>

References:
- Photo time are wrong
  - From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>
- Re: Photo time are wrong
  - From: Dave Thayer <debian1019421.dmthayer@recursor.net>
- UTC or localtime
  - From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>
- Re: UTC or localtime
  - From: "H.S." <hs.samix@gmail.com>
- Re: UTC or localtime
  - From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: UTC or localtime
Next by Date: Re: UTC or localtime
Previous by thread: Re: UTC or localtime
Next by thread: Re: Conclusion: FAT mount, UTC and localtime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread