Re: suspend to disk unreliable?
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 05:06:02PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> No, I think you still ignore what is this all about. I'll try to make it
> short and easy:
Your objections are completely irrelevant. I was saying that suspend
to disk is something that should work out of the box. The Debian
installer is another example for something that should work out of the
box. Yet suspending to disk doesn't, and I've seen the Debian
installer failing miserably as well because there wasn't any support
for SATA drives included despite they had already replaced the IDE
drives at that time. Still that doesn't mean that the Debian installer
and suspending to disk shouldn't work out of the box. You may have a
different opinion about what should work out of the box and what not,
but both our opinions about this are irrelevant.
As to warranties and certificates: If it would turn out that the USB
3.0 controller I bought a few days ago prevents suspending to disk, I
could return it to the store and either get another one or my money
back. I've recently done it with a graphics card that got too hot and
blanked out the screen and an USB card reader that wasn't detected at
all when plugged in. Nobody asked for any certificates, and even if
they did, I didn't agree to or sign any certificates when buying the
hardware.
So what's the point in your attempts to encounter practical experience
with returning hardware with the mentioning that I don't have
certificates that certify compatibility and therefore won't be able to
return the hardware if it doesn't work? I just return it.
Reply to: