Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.
Sorry, my mistake, nothing about 64 bit. I compiled the 32bit kernel in xfs.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds
<magicloud.magiclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default.
> How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a
> non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in
> English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the
> actual disk space that has data to write.
> And I think this is not just about ext3, but ext3 & 64bit. Because
> with the same environment, 32bit works fine for this process.
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:54 PM, H.S. <hs.samix@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>>> Thank you guys.
>>> I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It
>>> seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB,
>>> but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space
>>> was just empty and wasted.
>>
>> I experience the same thing some weeks ago (had to use a different
>> machine with a larger hard disk to get the job done). It is interesting
>> to note that you think that ext3 is at fault here. How did you find that
>> out? I would like to know whether it is a problem with ext3 at this time
>> in Unstable.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
>> newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just
>> filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without
>> ever having been read.
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: [🔎] i0ad2n$of0$1@dough.gmane.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] i0ad2n$of0$1@dough.gmane.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 竹密岂妨流水过
> 山高哪阻野云飞
>
--
竹密岂妨流水过
山高哪阻野云飞
Reply to: