Re: Iceweasel/FF makes the embedded videos going 4 times faster when it bugs!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:37:59 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>
> (...)
>
>>> Check if you already have the Adobe flash player version installed in
>>> your system.
>> Sure, and even the non-free one, that I installed manually. Adobe
>> (http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/) confirms it:
>>
>> ==
>> You have version 10,0,22,87 installed ==
>>
>> Thanks though.
>
> I've never experienced speed problems with Adobe Flash plugin. Well,
> "buffering" issues, yes (pauses) but not "double speed".
I experience it from it to time. Sad to be the only guy it happens to!
> Can you send a concrete URI where you are getting problems so we can
> check?
Whatever video you could ever get on youtube. Let's take for example
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GxLNNu74DE&feature=related if you want
a concrete URI. I could play it many times (without actually watching
it because I am currently not interested in it, I just took it as
randomly as possible), and it would always work, but, after some hours
of use, the video would double/triple/quadruple speed.
It happens more often with some websites, but videos need to be
`sufficiently long.' Such a website (which causes more often problems
with the player) is rtlinfo.be. Take for example the video
http://www.rtlinfo.be/info/economie/monde/521282/zone-euro-les-pays-a-la-rescousse-de-la-monnaie-unique
The player could here stall, or go quite faster than expected. Not
normal, definitively.
- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --
Give a stranger one of your smiles; it might be the only sunshine he
sees to day.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkvm8dsACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhzh3QCeOhLbEZ/fxPaoAyKEZdMMdgjj
HYQAn3A+fTOKfNPVal6ZG/ZlW6ogmYAS
=2wWv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: