Re: Filesystem recommendations

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem recommendations
From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:09:00 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2010.04.26.13.09.00@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] o2p258ced3f1004241053j28352c68v7fa61b56b021443b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4BD3425F.6080301@cox.net> <[🔎] 4BD3DEEF.7050305@allums.com> <[🔎] 4BD53D53.9050205@hardwarefreak.com> <[🔎] 4BD54D42.3030701@allums.com> <[🔎] 4BD562A7.3050907@hardwarefreak.com> <[🔎] r2g81c921f31004260456z3c6f41ddg86e45cdae1257104@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:56:21 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:

> Why Debian Installer doesn't change its default filesystem to xfs if it
> is better than ext3 / ext4? I think always is better stick to defaults
> if it is possible

XFS (and ReiserFS) were having (still have?) problems with GRUB legacy 
bootloader so defaulting the filsesystem to any of them could be a bit 
"risky".

I mean, not only "performance" is a key factor to determine a default 
filesystem :-)

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón

Reply to:

References:
- Filesystem recommendations
  - From: "B. Alexander" <storm16@gmail.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to Disk + blacklisted module = still trouble
Next by Date: Re: Just testing...
Previous by thread: Re: Filesystem recommendations
Next by thread: Re: Filesystem recommendations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread