Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands
On 2010-03-05 03:57, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using?
fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop
$ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - \
smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter:
spamfilter unix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq user=spamfilter \
argv=/usr/local/bin/spamfilter.sh \
-f ${sender} -- ${recipient}
Mmmm... are you using spamd/spamc?
The spamfilter.sh script runs spamc.
$ cat /usr/local/bin/spamfilter.sh
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/spamc | /usr/sbin/sendmail -i "$@"
exit $?
I ask because I think spamd/spamc can change its uid to read/write into
the users folders but it seems you are invoking spamfilter as user
"spamfilter" and maybe that user has not the rights to read the users
config files :-?
[snip]
Try by running "spamassassin -D --lint" and watch the "config: read file"
output lines.
Look, when I run "spamassassin -D --lint" as the user calling spamd
(sm02) I get:
***
[8059] dbg: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/65_debian.cf
[8059] dbg: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
[8059] dbg: config: using "/home/sm02/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user
prefs file
***
But when runned as "root" I get:
***
[8066] dbg: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/65_debian.cf
[8066] dbg: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
***
It cannot read the user's config file.
You're right, it looks like SA isn't running from each individual user.
me@haggis:~$ spamassassin -D --lint 2> SA-debug.output.txt
me@haggis:~$ grep user_prefs SA-debug.output.txt
Mar 5 11:32:48.538 [11220] dbg: config: using \
"/home/me/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user prefs file
Mar 5 11:32:48.538 [11220] dbg: config: read \
file /home/me/.spamassassin/user_prefs
root@haggis:~# spamassassin -D --lint 2> SA-debug.output.txt
root@haggis:~# grep user_prefs SA-debug.output.txt
root@haggis:~#
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms." Mike Ditka
Reply to: