Re: release cycles, security supports for multiple OSes
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:10:56 +0000, Kelly Harding wrote:
> On 27 February 2010 15:16, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Something like this?
>> +1 nice chart :-)
>> It lacks openSUSE, whose EOL is 18 months and Fedora (13 months).
> Neither of which are enterprise/stable releases in the same vein at
> RHEL, Debian stable etc, hence not ncluded.
Uh? I cannot speak for Fedora but sure openSUSE is rock-solid and has
stable release cycle. I was using it in my servers and workstations for
the last 6 years.
Besides, the OP did mention nothing about "enterprise" or "long term",
just "distros/operating systems" so the table is very good but leaves
many other distros (Archlinux, openSUSE, Fedora, Gentoo,
> Do Fedora even do long term support versions?
I guess no. As I already said, 13 months is their EOL support cycle.