[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Correct binary for Intel Core i5

In <4B821E8A.4040606@hardwarefreak.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>Peter Tenenbaum put forth on 2/21/2010 10:01 PM:
>> Stan --
>> It sounds like, if the Realtek drivers are not present on the Debian
>> distribution.
> [...] any software that doesn't meet the "Free"
> criteria isn't included by default.  For kernel drivers, this creates a
> huge problem.  There is no way to include "non-free" in your Debian kernel
> like you do in
>/apt/sources.list.  The Debian kernel team makes that choice for your.

That's not true.  Whenever a firmware is removed from the upstream kernel 
source, as long as it meets the requirements for non-free, it is put into a 
firmware package in non-free.  In addition, there's a linux-firmware meta-
package in non-free that installs all the firmware that comes with the 
upstream kernel.

>The really odd thing is that this firmware blob is included (was?) with the
>standard Lenny kernel, 2.6.26.  During development of the Squeeze and SID
>kernels, the Debian kernel team decided this firmware blob was no longer
>considered "free", so they removed it.

The Debian kernel team generally depends on bug reports to let them know that 
some new part of the upstream kernel is not free.  They remove it once the bug 
report is filed.

Since DDs are human, it is entirely possible for non-free parts of packages to 
slip through the cracks and get included in a release.  The kernel is not the 
first package to have this happen.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: