Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:28:39 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 4A65A667.4020707@cox.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4A659C61.1030806@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
References: <[🔎] bf0c3b3f0907070259u4ae4a1a4rf80e644dc55bf46e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200907071030.35590.bss@iguanasuicide.net> <[🔎] bf0c3b3f0907080304rd9ffc6bn513673f190985ad6@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200907081018.36385.bss@iguanasuicide.net> <[🔎] 87bpnu8x9r.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <[🔎] 4A63C20C.4030201@cox.net> <[🔎] 87k5226a5s.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 4A653B0C.80901@cox.net> <[🔎] 87ocresjb2.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <[🔎] 4A655762.6020602@cox.net> <[🔎] 4A659C61.1030806@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>

On 2009-07-21 05:45, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:

Ron Johnson wrote:

Then still I don't see the real gain to separating /usr and /usr/local
into their own partitions.


Just my humble guesswork: the same reasons as to why have /home on a
separate partition. /usr/local is the 'home' of custom software. ;-)


IOW, very dynamic?  Makes sense, for a certain class of users.

--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer

Reply to:

References:
- resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@ieee.org>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
  - From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: fallback smart hosts
Next by Date: Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop
Previous by thread: Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
Next by thread: Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread