Re: Lightweight alternative MTA? [was: Re: Starting MTA:]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:23:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> Not running a daemon means that you have the overhead of startup for
>> each new delivery. It implies less efficient handling of a queued mail.
>
> Given that he is doing this for local messages from daemons only I think
> resident memory is the primary concern, not efficiency of once or twice a
> day deliveries. Something I can understand given that I've moved most of
> my productivity work to a Dell Mini. The thought of having an MTA
> resident all the time doesn't exactly fill me with glee. Not that this
> machine can't handle it (it is more capable than most people think) but
> because this machine has no business having a resident MTA.
What desktop are you running there?
How many panel applets?
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
tzafrir@cohens.org.il | | best
ICQ# 16849754 | | friend
Reply to: