[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

Hash: SHA1

Sorry, sent it to Chris Jones, not the list by mistake.

- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 12:27:06 +0100
From: Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>
To: Chris Jones <cjns1989@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 87hc04vds8.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 49FB4E23.8040501@l33tmyst.com>
<[🔎] 20090501234026.GC2905@turki.gavron.org>
<[🔎] 87zldwnzi6.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 20090502112017.GA2893@turki.gavron.org>

Chris Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:02:09PM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
>> jidanni wrote:
>>> Why must emacs depend on sound packages?
>> I had never noticed that.  Pretty objectionable, I think.  I have no use
>> for sound in Emacs.  It should be at most a "Suggests".
>> Chris Jones writes:
>>> I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another
>>> editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed?
>> I use both Emacs and Vi.
>>> ... and there you have it.. I think that the correct answer is that emacs
>>> is not an editor..
>> Its primary function is editing.  Therefor it is an editor.
> Sorry, forgot the smiley.
> CJ
Plus, even though emacs does other stuff apart from editing, what can
emacs do that a separate tool can't do? Surely if emacs is more than an
editor, it doesn't follow Doug McIlroy's UNIX philosophy:

Write programs that *do one thing and do it well*. Write programs to
work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface

- --
Many thanks
Harry Rickards (a.k.a l33tmyst)

Version: 3.1
GAT/GCM/GCS/GCC/GIT/GM d? s: a? C++++ UL++++ P- L+++ !E W+++ N o? K+
w--- O- M- V-PS+  PE Y+ PGP++ t 5 X R tv-- b+++ DI D---- G e* h! !r y?
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


Reply to: