Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sorry, sent it to Chris Jones, not the list by mistake.
- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 12:27:06 +0100
From: Harry Rickards <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Chris Jones <email@example.com>
References: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org> <[🔎] 49FB4E23.email@example.com>
<[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org> <[🔎] 20090502112017.GA2893@turki.gavron.org>
Chris Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:02:09PM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
>> jidanni wrote:
>>> Why must emacs depend on sound packages?
>> I had never noticed that. Pretty objectionable, I think. I have no use
>> for sound in Emacs. It should be at most a "Suggests".
>> Chris Jones writes:
>>> I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another
>>> editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed?
>> I use both Emacs and Vi.
>>> ... and there you have it.. I think that the correct answer is that emacs
>>> is not an editor..
>> Its primary function is editing. Therefor it is an editor.
> Sorry, forgot the smiley.
Plus, even though emacs does other stuff apart from editing, what can
emacs do that a separate tool can't do? Surely if emacs is more than an
editor, it doesn't follow Doug McIlroy's UNIX philosophy:
Write programs that *do one thing and do it well*. Write programs to
work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
Harry Rickards (a.k.a l33tmyst)
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GAT/GCM/GCS/GCC/GIT/GM d? s: a? C++++ UL++++ P- L+++ !E W+++ N o? K+
w--- O- M- V-PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t 5 X R tv-- b+++ DI D---- G e* h! !r y?
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----