Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
> Why must emacs depend on sound packages?
I had never noticed that. Pretty objectionable, I think. I have no use
for sound in Emacs. It should be at most a "Suggests".
Chris Jones writes:
> I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another
> editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed?
I use both Emacs and Vi.
> ... and there you have it.. I think that the correct answer is that emacs
> is not an editor..
Its primary function is editing. Therefor it is an editor.