Re: package management begins to annoy me
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:28:13PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 16:34:38 Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 02/26/2009 03:20 PM, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> > > So, am I doing something completely wrong here?
> >
> > Yes, you're using aptitude. Return to the apt* which God intended
> > us to use: apt-get.
>
> Ignore Ron. Aptitude has been the recommended (by DDs) package manager
> since Etch was released. It has better dependency resolution, is more user-
> friendly, and is a bit more tunable.
"Better" dependency resolution is subjective. While it's certainly
cleverer and more complex, aptitude often fails to do the right thing
where the simpler algorithm apt-get uses behaves correctly.
For example, 'aptitude upgrade' often wants to remove packages where
'apt-get upgrade' would just keep them back. It offers multiple
solutions to problems, but not the simplest solution of not upgrading
to the current version.
In many cases, the simpler apt-get algorithm for upgrade and
dist-upgrade Does The Right Thing where aptitude does not. IMHO the
additional complexity makes aptitude less user friendly. I wouldn't
be surprised if apt-get doesn't become the recommended upgrade tool
for Squeeze; unless aptitude fixes its algorithm to work better in
common cases, without requiring user action to solve dependency
problems, I will support such a change.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Reply to: