[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 答复: Stunned by aptitude.

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:03 -0400, Barclay, Daniel wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:19 +1000, CaT wrote:
> >
> >> I believe that would be the point the original poster was getting
> at. If
> >> aptitude is really doing that then it is in the wrong.
> >
> > I understood it, but given that this is how apt has always worked
> and is
> > documented to work, why change it now?
> Because it's error-prone.  Because it's a poor-quality design.

Might want to check yourself before you wreck yourself:  The same could
be said for your HTML-spewing MUA.

Paul Johnson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: