On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:32:30PM +0000, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:25:47 +1000, Adrian Levi wrote: > > > > I can't understand why Emacs would depend on one package manager over > > another. Unless I'm missing the bleeding obvious. > > Well, it *is* emacs. Maybe it has an operating mode where it acts as a > front-end to aptitude? > since one needs a package manager to run their operating system... and how else would they expect to install an editor in that OS? /me ducks and runs back to my emacs... A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature