[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: disassembling machine code



On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:12:58PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> was heard to say:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Daniel_Burrows@verizon.net was heard to say:
> > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> 
> [removed]
> 
> >   I did not write this email.  I don't have any problem with it, but I
> > didn't write it.
> > 
> >   Whoever did: please refrain from forging other people's email
> > addresses in your From header.
> 
> Mutt may be a lesser piece of crap than most mailers, but it is still a
> piece of crap.  It screws up when "From:" is missing, and acts as if you
> had send it.

  I think it may be worse than that: I set my MTA up to add a default
>From field to outgoing email, but it ended up applying to incoming mail
as well.

  In which case it's not Mirko's fault at all.  Mirko, I'm sorry I
jumped on you like that.  Probably I should have realized something
screwy was going on and checked other possibilities first.

  Daniel


Reply to: