Re: Evo vs. Icedove (was Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux)
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:15 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> How much memory does Evo use? I switched from Evo to ID because of
> bloat and Evo's ties to GNOME, but ID has RES 81m and SHR 23m. So
> I'm thinking of reinstalling Evo.
>
Using XFce as my environment, while replying to your message:
VIRT RES SHR
138m 57m 21m evolution
But then that really isn't including the backend processes for
evolution.
VIRT RES SHR
235m 9.9m 5408 evolution-data-server
36160 9296 7764 evolution-exchange-storage
67692 9.8m 8364 evolution-alarm-notify
Of course, you can turn off the exchange and alarm notify now. I just
haven't. So in reality the RES for ALL processes is 85.9m and the SHR
for all is 42.4m, roughly equivalent if you are lazy.
But, I can say the ONLY part my evo is having any problem with is,
moving messages to and from the "high-count" folders. But that would
apply to icedove or any other mail-client.
I am using: Evolution 2.8.2.1 from experimental.
--
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's
Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive
product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at
the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
Reply to: