Re: GPG and Signing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joe Hart wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> Joe Hart writes:
>>> I also have serious doubts over the real security benefits of SELinux
>>> specifically because it was developed by the NSA. It is not rational
>>> that they would design a security system that they could not access, and
>>> then release it to the public.
>> Only if you have a very naive and simplistic view of NSA and its mission.
>
> My doubts of the NSA mostly come from watching too many "conspiracy
> theory" books, and knowing that the NSA is an unregulated branch of US
> government. The phrase "in the interest of National Security" has been
> and can be used to cover up just about anything, and the NSA is one
> organization that frankly scares me in what they can get away with.
>
> That's where my distrust comes from. The FAA and FCC are not much
> better. But those organizations don't concern me much anymore because I
> am no longer a resident of the United States. Now get to be watched by
> the CIA instead of the FBI, and the ATF. Although there are rumors...
>
> Again, we're getting way off topic here. Politics doesn't really belong
> on this list and I do not plan to engage in discussing it further. Let
> us just leave it alone. I don't really care what the US Government
> does unless they start ordering the military to drop bombs in my
> neighborhood.
>
> Joe
>
Do'h, watching books, that's good. I meant reading books and watching
movies. The least I could do is proofread my own messages. Shame on me.
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGEADZiXBCVWpc5J4RAnGcAKC2oMhOUsBUuhgUaHfjpnB6kabjEgCgnGOZ
tU0/nG+YwTeoAMHXsfA7WjI=
=1T1e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: