[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian User List



On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:16:39PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 20:45 -0500, John C wrote:
> > 
> > Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 13:45 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> > >>> Actually, I would prefer if [OT] messages would be kept [OOTL]
> > >>> (out of this list)
> > >> I said this once before and got shot down, but here it is again:
> > >>
> > >> If this list is supposed to be for idle chit-chat among the debian
> > >> community, then we really have no mailing list specifically for people to
> > >> talk about debian, or get help about debian. We should have at least another
> > >> list, probably "debian-help".
> > > 
> > > Okay, so why would *I* subscribe to that list?
> > > 
> > 
> > A better question would be.. Why would those who are tired of the 
> > OT bull sessions want you to?
> > 
> > It would probably be a lot better for the new users to help 
> > themselves than to be pawns for your ego. Sure they'll make 
> > mistakes, but I suspect they'll learn more in the long run.
> 
> Piss-off. I don't do it for ego, but it seems you do.
>

Calm down before things get nasty, this isn't Gentoo it's Debian ;D

But seriously, no need for attacking each other here. [OT] is bad
enough, but of course you can just filter [OT] messages to be deleted
using procmail, or something like that.

And seriously, I've noticed most OT threads and "No more OT" threads
become flamewars. I personally think that these threads are worse than
the actual OT threads.



Reply to: