Re: Penalty of SELinux?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/07 18:23, Mike McCarty wrote:
> consultores agropecuarios wrote:
>>
>> The real problem with SELinux is that it come from a really well known
>> untrusted organization around the globe; and if the Debian Team accep it
>> blindly, Debian is going to become as Windows; remember that, who
>
> I don't think anyone has accepted SELinux "blindly".
>
>> creates, know it the best; and a group of pepople could see into our own
>> machine when they want it. Particularly, i do not want that! It is
>> exactly, giving the realized work, for decades, to the enemy!
>
> The NSA is not the enemy, unless you are trying to subvert
> the USA.
In a unipolar (and post-unipolar) world, economic espionage is just
as important as government espionage.
> I don't want SELinux, either, but that isn't the
> reason.
>
> But, this is getting into topic drift. On Fedora, there is
> an extensive argument going on over this.
>
> Mike
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG+Ff1S9HxQb37XmcRAs+zAJwO0kr750xyS4VXHyRvvz3jxB8WvQCgkeLr
CPjeRL4qbuucX7aPM16kkkk=
=Te7t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: