[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SELinux Suggestion



On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:56:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:06:11 +0900, Takehiko Abe <keke@gol.com> said: 
> 
> > Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> That is not the case. All core libraries and packages have already
> >> been patched and are functional in Etch.  You did not even notice it,
> >> because they are optional.
> 
> > libselinux and libsepol are required and are not optional.
> 
>         And, while present, there is no change in behaviour unless
>  special action is taken to activate SELinux functionality. The
>  libraries are small; considering the sizes of libraries that large
>  segments of users do not use that are part of the base, I do not think
>  this is unreasonable space and memory utilization. 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> __> ll -h /lib/libse*
> 100K -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  91K 2007-07-06 21:00 /lib/libselinux.so.1
> 172K -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 161K 2007-07-06 21:07 /lib/libsemanage.so.1
> 248K -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 240K 2007-07-06 21:01 /lib/libsepol.so.1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> > I bet that selinux is of no use for majority of us. I wish the patches
> > to be left as seperate patches. Those who need selinux wouldn't
> > object. A special destribution would be even better -- "Debian
> > Enterprise".
> 
>         I think better security is useful for every one of us; but that
>  is not the question here.  Debian is about giving the widest range of
>  options to our users; and while that means sometimes the distribution
>  carries changes that are only useful to a subset of the users, the
>  choices are still there for those that want them.
> 
>         We try or best to minimize the impact on people who do not want
>  to use optional functionality, and in this case, we have tried to make
>  the SELinux as non-intrusive as possible for people who are not using
>  it.
> 
>         I am planning on a special distribution when SELinux support
>  gets far enough along -- A Debian SELinux custom distribution; where
>  SELinux support shall be installable fully  configured and in enforcing
>  mode.

Hi

Why not make a different section on the normal stable / testing / unstable 
streams.  so non-free contrib and selinux place all the selinux patch stuff 
under there ?

Alex

> 
>         manoj
> -- 
> If you don't drink it, someone else will.
> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: